Intellectual property Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 2000 words

Intellectual seat - Essay ExampleThe important purpose of having copyright is to provide authors and artists a chance to produce new works. (Aplin & Davies, 2010) Intellectual property fair play ensures that authors and artists are given their earnings through official distributors (record companies, for example Economists refer to these as property stewards) for recordings of this seminal and intellectual work, which eventually give money to the authors and artists. Digital technology arriveers make peer-to-peer networks, which enable people to concur the same works without paying. Acquiring the works with this method is similar to stealing, as per copyright law, hence it is mustiness to reaffirm, and even extend, copyright law to criminalise the use of networkers who copy others work.Hence, what Kenneth performed should be seen as breaching copyright law. The port of Intellectual Property provides a logical scrutiny of why the music, TV and movie industries arguments to dev elope copyright and deem certain technologies are more persuasiveto judges, justices, university administrators, college students, and the general publicthan those of copyright activists who seek to keep peer-to-peer networks dissolve and legal to restrict the extension of copyright time limits and copy-protection tools to guarantee a plentiful, continually replenished public humans of content and to preserve fair use rights for content currently under copyright. By doing research intimately this topic, one can have a more solid perceptive of the descriptions of piracy and sharing, and can hold out precisely why so few of the students in University are capable of presenting an argument in privilege of file sharing. According to some experts, peer-to-peer network technology can take our society towards a affirmative direction, but some argue that the same thing is bad for the society. British Government has a invent of introducing a right of information requiring disclosure of names and addresses of individuals that are involved in the creation and scattering of the infringing goods and services or both with quantities and prices charged. Remedies will be strengthened to permit eternal removal or demolition of the infringing material together with the everlasting injunctions, compensation and damages. Differential attitudes toward theft of physical versus intellectual property (IP) become an change magnitudely serious chore as the latter become an ever-greater share of the total sparing value of production. Intellectual capitals rising value in the production of wealth has been mirrored by its increasing vulnerability to crime (Snyder & Crescenzi, 2009). The cost of intellectual property theft in 2004 was estimated to be $250 billion and climb (Wright, 2004). Losses due to all sorts of piracy in the music and film industries alone are currently estimated to be in the tens of billions of dollars (Szuskin, et al., 2009). Hence, Intellectual property theft has become a very serious problem as the result of computers increasing role in the everyday life of the public (Picard, 2004). Traditional approaches to the bar of theft are mainly to protect the goods and to catch and punish perpetrators, but these are increasingly intemperate to accomplish in this digital age (Peace & Thong, 2003). The facility with which digital information can be stored, communicated, and disseminated makes it highly difficult to contain and protect. When physical property is stolen, its absence makes the theft far more readily notice than when digital property is copied while the original data remains intact and appears untouched. Thus, detection of the crime and set out of the thief are no easy matter. Despite these limitations, producers of digital property are striving to develop and improve protective measures (Im & Koen, 1990 Waterman, et al., 2007 Wright, 2004). If you learned that a friend had gone into an acquaintances home and